Direct Proof
Proving the Sum of Two Even Numbers is Even
Prove: If $a$ and $b$ are even integers, then $a + b$ is even.
State the hypothesis: Assume $a$ and $b$ are even integers = Given: $a$ and $b$ are even
Apply the definition of even: An even integer can be written as $2k$ for some integer $k$ = $a = 2m$ and $b = 2n$ for integers $m, n$
Add the two numbers: $a + b = 2m + 2n$ = $a + b = 2m + 2n$
Factor out the common factor: $a + b = 2(m + n)$ = $a + b = 2(m + n)$
Apply the definition of even again: Since $m + n$ is an integer, $2(m + n)$ is even by definition = $a + b$ is even
Answer: Therefore, the sum of two even integers is always even. QED
Proving the Square of an Odd Number is Odd
Prove: If $n$ is an odd integer, then $n^2$ is odd.
State the hypothesis: Assume $n$ is an odd integer = Given: $n$ is odd
Apply the definition of odd: An odd integer can be written as $2k + 1$ for some integer $k$ = $n = 2k + 1$ for some integer $k$
Square the expression: $n^2 = (2k + 1)^2$ = $n^2 = (2k + 1)^2$
Expand using algebra: $n^2 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1$ = $n^2 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1$
Factor to show odd form: $n^2 = 2(2k^2 + 2k) + 1$ = $n^2 = 2(2k^2 + 2k) + 1$
Conclude using definition: This is $2m + 1$ where $m = 2k^2 + 2k$ is an integer = $n^2$ is odd
Answer: Therefore, the square of an odd integer is always odd. QED
Proving a Divisibility Property
Prove: If $n$ is an integer, then $n^3 - n$ is divisible by 3.
Factor the expression: $n^3 - n = n(n^2 - 1)$ = $n^3 - n = n(n^2 - 1)$
Factor further using difference of squares: $n(n^2 - 1) = n(n-1)(n+1)$ = $n^3 - n = (n-1) \cdot n \cdot (n+1)$
Recognize the pattern: $(n-1)$, $n$, $(n+1)$ are three consecutive integers = Product of 3 consecutive integers
Apply number theory fact: Among any 3 consecutive integers, exactly one is divisible by 3 = One factor is divisible by 3
Conclude: Since one factor is divisible by 3, the entire product is divisible by 3 = $n^3 - n$ is divisible by 3
Answer: Therefore, for any integer $n$, the expression $n^3 - n$ is divisible by 3. QED
Mistake: Using specific examples instead of general proof
Why: Showing that $2 + 4 = 6$ (even) proves nothing about ALL even numbers. A proof must work for every possible case.
Correct: Use variables and definitions. Write 'Let $a = 2m$ for some integer $m$' to represent ANY even number.
Mistake: Assuming what you want to prove
Why: You cannot use the conclusion in your reasoning. This is circular logic.
Correct: Start only from the hypothesis and work forward. Never write 'Since $a + b$ is even...' until you have proven it.
Mistake: Skipping logical steps
Why: Each step must follow logically from previous steps. Gaps in reasoning can hide errors.
Correct: Justify every step with a definition, axiom, or previously proven theorem.
Software Verification
Programmers use direct proof logic to verify that their code works correctly for all inputs.
To prove a sorting algorithm always produces sorted output, we show: if the input is a list, the output has the same elements in non-decreasing order.
Legal Reasoning
Lawyers construct arguments that logically lead from evidence to conclusions.
If the contract states payment is due upon delivery, and delivery occurred on March 1, then payment was due on March 1.
A direct proof assumes the hypothesis is true and derives the conclusion through logical steps
Use definitions to translate words into mathematical expressions (e.g., even = $2k$)
Each step must follow logically from previous steps using algebra, definitions, or theorems
The proof ends when you reach the exact form of the conclusion
QED (quod erat demonstrandum) marks the end of a proof
Q: How do I know when to use direct proof versus other methods?
A: Try direct proof first for positive statements like 'If A, then B.' If you get stuck, consider proof by contradiction or contrapositive. Direct proof works well when you can manipulate the hypothesis algebraically.
Q: What does QED mean?
A: QED stands for 'quod erat demonstrandum' (Latin for 'which was to be demonstrated'). It signals the proof is complete. Some mathematicians use a square symbol (tombstone) instead.
Q: How detailed should my steps be?
A: Each step should be justified by a definition, property, or theorem. If you skip steps, you risk hiding errors. When in doubt, include more detail.
Direct Proof
1 / 11
Direct Proof
Learn to construct direct proofs by logically deriving conclusions from given hypotheses using definitions, axioms, and previously proven theorems.